When I see the price of that piece of kit, I feel very guilty that I
use your observations gratis. I have found that yours and those of
Royston Iceni:
http://www.iceni.org.uk/
are almost always in amazing agreement. I dont live directly between
the two stations but not far off. My own observations (as far as they
go) are very similar to Epping and Iceni. So if I cant do any
observations myself, I use those two stations and make some
(empirical) corrections. I have found that in fine weather, as would
be expected given my altitude of 140 metres ASL, my Tmax is about 1C
lower. Similarly, my rainfall totals (garden centre rain gauge) are
about 10% greater presumably an orographic effect. I cant cross
check sunshine totals, but would imagine due to our altitude, are
decidedly lower. Hill fog is quite a feature here.
So thanks George for a free service!
Jack
PS The spell checker didnt like orographic and I leave you to guess
the first suggested alternative:-)
I checked what I originally paid for the sunshine recorder in 2001 and not
much difference. However the unit has proved very reliable which is just as
well from a cost point of view and fact it is atop a long pole at the gable
end. Richard Barker, who runs the Royston Iceni website was very helpful
when I was setting up Epping Weather. Like you I have regularly used
several strategically located sites including Royston, Clifton (Bedford)
http://www.cliftonweather.co.uk/ and Southend
http://www.southendweather.net/ as well as
http://www.weather-uk.com/hampstead/data.htm for a trip down memory lane
North London style.
All the best
--
George in Epping, West Essex (107m asl)
www.eppingweather.co.uk
www.winter1947.co.uk
COL 36055